Currently, more than 6,000 languages are still spoken on planet Earth.
Languages are communication tools that improve and facilitate understanding within societies. They constitute a fast and effective way to express our inner thoughts in a sensitive (auditory, visual or tactile) and public way. While telepathy is also there, and could be a more effective alternative, the average human lacks that ability. Perhaps There Will Come A Day When A Gadget Could Be Attached To The Forehead, And Our Thoughts Are Electronically Broadcast To A Paired Headset, Which Can Then Verbalize The Thought Signals, Or Alternatively Pass The Signal To Another Human Wearing A Paired Companion Headset.
With globalization, we are witnessing the disappearance of many languages at a worrying rate. Currently, according to a study, one language becomes extinct every two weeks! Obviously, a language conversely takes years and centuries to mature. On the contrary, some languages spread and acquire importance to the detriment of others, thus dominating other cultures. Please Identify Yourself ! How and why do these languages disappear? This alarming extinction comes paradoxically from the deliberate inability of men to understand each other. The introduction of a common language would arrest this, and English, which never ceases to spread, seems to impose itself as such.
English is the most widely spoken language on earth, and it doesn’t look as if that trend is likely to change soon, as a language adoption has a way of compounding. In Diversity Lies Disunity, and we could almost say that English language is prospering at the detriment of so many other languages.The domination of a language certainly facilitates trade, particularly in commerce, but it also has darker consequences.
In Nigeria, For Example, There Are Over 521 Languages That Have Been Spoken (At Least 9 Of Them Are Now Extinct)
This country is in possession of large reserves of mineral resources that are of great value, which is why foreigners flock into Nigeria, despite our many problems. By communicating with the world dominant languages like English and French, Nigerians and many urban African societies neglect local languages, causing them to gradually become extinct. These practices brings us to the consequences of the disappearance of a language. It is assumed that there is no relationship or competition between languages and that each of them is rich in a singular culture. We must therefore consider with equal importance the disappearance of each language and ask ourselves what the deleterious effects are. We can see that the cultural domain suffers greatly from these linguistic extinctions.
The most striking example is undoubtedly that of the literary arts. If a language disappears, all the works written in this language lose their value because, being never quite exact, the translation inevitably leads to a loss of the richness of the original text (meanings get lost or obfuscated along with differences in the use of certain figures of speech like the alliterations, the assonances or even some metaphors).
The play on words suffers erosion during translation since this is specific to the language and culture that language speaks of.. If the disappearance of a language strongly affects the literary arts, history also has a close relationship with the language. Historical memory, for example, survives through language use. This is the case in particular with the term “SS” which is due to the inventions of Nazi Germany. Without the German language, this one would lose all its meaning – “Schutzstaffel”, which means “word-for-word ” protection team. This expression therefore has a major meaning for the understanding of the story.
Thus, we can affirm that language is to history what history is to language. Traditions and culture are threatened with extinction with the fading of a language, and all effort should be made to preserve languages.. Let us take the example of the Thai language, in which the word “NO” does not exist. This one is considered as an impoliteness, a lack of respect towards his interlocutor they are words that don’t have equivalents in other languages. Such words show us something unique or special about a culture – they might have a word for something that people in other cultures may have never thought of. The Thais have a singular way of perceiving the world, which might seem to be a brake on communication in the eyes of Westerners. This absence of “NO” is symptomatic of the Thai culture: it is based on a principle of respect and benevolence. If the Thai language were to become extinct, all that cultural heritage would disappear along with it.
The disappearance of a language also has intellectual consequences. In the expression “it rains” is articulated all the paradox of the subject. “It” does not designate anyone in particular. Languages without a subject therefore offer an interesting view of the world, since they do not engender the illusion of the thinking self. Their disappearance would thus cause a loss of the diversity of all the thoughts that language generates.In a more radical way, George Orwell in his 1984 novel imagines a “Newspeak” language whose principle is to reduce the number of words to impoverish the concepts. According to him, the concept would disappear with the word. Let us follow the example of the term “liberty. Freedom as a word conveys the idea of freedom as a concept. We can therefore question the value of words: – language would be the breeding ground of our consciousness. By reducing the finesse of language, we lose our ability to think.
Can Humans Think With The Same Facility If There Was No Language? Can Animals Think, Or Merely Follow Instinct?
By reducing the number of existing languages, it is the visions of the world that are disappearing. By reducing the number of languages on planet Earth, it is humanity in its diversity that is threatened.Let us first note that Nietzsche presents the common usage of language as a vulgarization of thought, a trivialization that would make it superficial. To substitute for the current use of language a poetic use would make it possible to fight against the trivialization of our thoughts by language. Also, within a language there exist many dialects, intonations and accents. Should we, therefore, regard them as singular visions of the world?Language can illustrate great principles such as freedom, morality or even happiness. Having no concrete relationship with reality, they do not come up against anything empirical, and are subject to subjective interpretation.
There are many concepts that can only be expressed in one language, and not easily expressed in another language with the same exactness.Is happiness not simply an insignificant concept lost in the illusion of language that would allow man to flee what is inevitably, death?The nuances that one can bring about the importance of language makes it possible to emphasize the lesser impact of the disappearance of a particular language. Nevertheless, by admitting the extinction of a language, a standardization of thought seems inevitable. Language, like specific species of animals gone extinct, can never be brought back into existence.Since every language proposes a specific vision of the world, when one of them dies, it is a singular look at the world that disappears with it.
Do you speak YOUR language?